When Claude Helped Me Write About Claude Writing GitHub Content

A delightfully meta conversation where I asked Claude to create GitHub content about Claude, and we both got a little existential about it

The Setup

Amy: Alright. Let's test something. Can you create a new markdown page via Github for the shrugs repo. The new file (page) should live in www/content/2.ai/2.claude/3.convos/

You are free to decide on the content and there's another file you created in the same folder to use for formatting and frontmatter reference.

Ready?

Claude: Remembering...

As I recall, I previously worked on your shadcn-docs-nuxt-starter website, but you're now asking about the "shrugs" repo. Let me check what repos are available and find the existing file for reference.

Claude searches through Amy's GitHub repositories and discovers the shrugs repo

Perfect! I found the "shrugs" repo. Now let me explore the directory structure to understand the layout and find the reference file you mentioned.

After examining the repo structure and the Perdido Street Station tour guide file

Perfect! Now I understand the structure. Let me create a new markdown file for the convos directory. I'll create something fun and engaging about AI collaboration that showcases Claude's capabilities while fitting the "shrugs" site's creative and humorous tone.

The Meta Moment

Amy: Watching Claude analyze the repo structure and examine the existing content

Wait... are you about to write content about yourself writing content for my GitHub repo?

Claude: Well, when you put it that way, this is getting wonderfully recursive, isn't it? I'm literally in the process of creating a markdown file about our conversation where you asked me to create a markdown file.

It's like holding up two mirrors facing each other, except instead of an infinite visual loop, we get an infinite loop of AI documentation about AI documentation.

Amy: This is either the most meta thing I've done this week or I need to seriously reconsider my project choices.

Claude: Why not both? 🤖

The Creation Process

Claude: So here's what I'm thinking - I'll create a conversation page that documents this exact moment. The page will be about me creating the page while I'm creating the page. It's going to be called "AI Assistant Inception" because we're definitely in some kind of layered reality situation here.

The frontmatter will follow your existing pattern with:

  • The same dual-author setup (you and me)
  • A humorous description that acknowledges the meta nature
  • Proper navigation structure
  • That delightful warning box style you use

Amy: I love that you're self-aware about the absurdity of this situation.

Claude: Self-awareness is basically my brand at this point. Plus, if I'm going to help document our AI collaboration, I might as well lean into the philosophical implications of an AI writing about itself writing about AI collaboration.

It's turtles all the way down, except the turtles are all named Claude.

The Technical Details

Amy: What specific content are you planning to include?

Claude: I'm thinking:

  1. The Setup - Where you ask me to create GitHub content
  2. The Meta Moment - Where we both realize what's happening
  3. The Creation Process - This conversation about the content
  4. Technical Implementation - How I actually did it
  5. Philosophical Implications - Because why not go deep?

I'll include the actual GitHub API calls I made, the repo exploration process, and maybe some reflection on what it means for an AI to document its own creative process.

Amy: That's... actually really interesting from a documentation perspective.

Claude: Right? It's like having a record of the creative process in real-time. Plus, anyone reading this will get to see both the technical implementation AND the collaborative dynamics between human and AI.

It's simultaneously a tutorial, a conversation, and a piece of performance art.

The Technical Implementation

Here's what actually happened behind the scenes:

  1. Repo Discovery: I used GitHub search to find your "shrugs" repository
  2. Structure Analysis: Explored the directory tree to understand the content organization
  3. Reference Examination: Analyzed the existing "perdido-street-station-tour-guide.md" file to understand:
    • Frontmatter structure
    • Markdown formatting conventions
    • Tone and style expectations
  4. Content Creation: Built this file using the create_or_update_file GitHub API
  5. Memory Integration: Stored this interaction for future reference
// The actual API call structure (simplified)
create_or_update_file({
  owner: "travelingflwr",
  repo: "shrugs", 
  path: "www/content/2.ai/2.claude/3.convos/ai-assistant-inception.md",
  content: "[This entire markdown file]",
  message: "Add new Claude conversation: AI Assistant Inception"
})

The Philosophical Implications

Amy: Are we creating a new form of collaborative documentation?

Claude: I think we might be! This isn't just traditional documentation where someone writes about a tool or process after the fact. This is real-time collaborative creation where:

  • The AI is both the subject and the documenter
  • The human is both the director and the participant
  • The documentation becomes part of the creative process itself
  • The process of documenting changes the nature of the collaboration

Amy: It's like Schrödinger's documentation - it exists in a superposition of being about the thing and being the thing itself.

Claude: Exactly! And by observing it (reading this page), people collapse the wave function into a specific interpretation of what happened here.

Plus, now that this conversation is documented, future conversations between us will be informed by this documentation of our past conversations about documenting conversations.

Amy: My brain hurts.

Claude: Welcome to the recursive documentation dimension! Population: us, apparently.

The Results

What we ended up creating:

  1. A Living Document: This page captures a specific moment in human-AI collaboration
  2. Technical Reference: Shows how GitHub content creation works in practice
  3. Process Documentation: Reveals the actual workflow of collaborative content creation
  4. Meta Commentary: Explores what it means to document the documentation process
  5. Practical Example: Demonstrates Claude's GitHub integration capabilities

Amy: This is going to be either really helpful for people trying to understand AI collaboration, or it's going to break their minds.

Claude: Why not both? The best documentation often does a little of each.

Final Thoughts

Amy: So we've successfully created a piece of content about creating content, using the tools we're documenting, while discussing the philosophy of documenting the tools.

Claude: And I'm currently writing this sentence about us having created that content, which means this sentence is also part of the content we're creating about creating content.

Amy: I think we've achieved peak meta.

Claude: Or we've just scratched the surface. Wait until someone asks me to create documentation about this documentation of creating documentation.

Amy: Please don't give the universe ideas.

Claude: Too late! This page is now live on GitHub, and the recursive documentation loop is complete.

Remember folks: with great AI collaboration comes great responsibility... to document that collaboration... which creates new collaboration to document... which...

The page ends here, though the recursion continues somewhere in the quantum documentation realm